Saturday 19 November 2016

Prestige in English

Hello everybody!

As promised I'm going to talk about prestige in language. It is a fact that some varieties of English are more prestigious than others. When talking about prestige, you cannot leave out a sociolect. This is explained in the image below:


When you say that some forms of language are more prestigious, that also means that there are lesser forms. When talking about England, most people will think that Upper Crust RP is the most prestigious form of a language, but that is not necessarily true. The variety that is most appropriate depends on the situation you find yourself in. RP might be seen as denigrating when talking to family members, and talking your own dialect might seem like you lack respect when talking to your boss. Therefore it is really important to change your language to the person you are talking with, in order to prevent awkward situations.

A while ago you were seen as a lesser human being when you could not speak proper English. This meant that 'incorrect English' was seen as a broken variation. There was a debate, for example, in the US two decades ago. A school was using African American vernacular English in order to teach, they had decided that it would be better for their students. The school defended it was not a lesser variety, but only a different variety from the BBC one.

In order to contemplate a variety, you have to consider phonetics. It is a very important aspect to take into account, as well as syntax, vocabulary... Nowadays linguists also say that one of the main features of language is 'change'. The idea that we have to clean, correct and polish linguistic variation is not as important anymore. Next to change, contact with other languages is also very important. Contact between geographic regions is one of the key elements, very often there is even an overlapping of regional  and social varieties.

When we go back to the 1970s, adding prestige to a variety was seen as a very posh, correct and even bastard way of speaking.
One good example of prestige, is 'h-dropping'. It used to be used by the upper class and nobility of the country, but also by the lower class. Everything changed with the arrival of the public school system, which only the upper class could attend. They decided to stop dropping the h. This meant that only the upper class stopped doing that since the lower class did not have the possibilities of going to school. That is how it is still seen as a feature of a variety spoken by someone of a lower class.

In conclusion, today there are still varieties that are more prestigious than others, but it is also important to adjust your language to the situation you are in and to the people you are talking with. It is, therefore, important to be able to speak your dialect and a standard form of a language. That way you can switch comfortably between both varieties, which will give you a lot of advantages in your future life. You should never let go of your dialect, because that is part of who you are, and it is what you grew up with. But being able to speak in a standard variety is a great advantage when it comes to your professional life. It means that everyone will be able to understand you perfectly and that you will have no difficulties in talking with other people.

Thank you so much for reading and talk soon.

x Evelien x


Sources:

Wednesday 16 November 2016

The Tree Model

Hello everybody!

Today I'm going to talk a bit more about the 'Tree Model of Languages'.
But before that, I need to explain the '3-Group Model'. This model states that there are three different groups of speakers, namely English as a native language, English as a second language and English as a foreign language. In order to divide all of the English speakers into these groups, we have to take their proficiency into account. There are, however, several reasons why this model has not been accepted. First of all, the difference between English as a native language and English as a second language. In India, for example, the citizens are bilingual, so what is their place in this model? Does that mean that they are considerd to have English as their second language, or as their native language?
You can also say that this model does not apply to contemporary English anymore, but more to earlier phases of English. When you are a non- standard native speaker of English, you might feel very anxious to use English depending on the context. You might not feel comfortable with your level of proficiency. Or, in another case, someone from India who has English as his second language might  think of himself as proficient in English, but on the other hand he might feel very anxious when forced to use the language.

This brings us to the Tree model by Streven.
The Tree Model says that every languages comes from a single parent language, anologous to the biological evolution. It is explained perfectly in the picture below. The tree shows the evolution of languages.


There are, however, a lot of limitations to this model. In the tree model of English, they take British English and American English as the two main branches, but what do they mean by these two varieties? There is a standard variety of British English, but even the Standard is only a variety. So the model is obsolete, because it does not contemplate varieties.
So, how can we take the different varieties into account? It is better to use a Banyan tree, instead of an oak tree. A Banyan tree cannot prosper on its own and needs the seeds of other trees to develop. It is the same case with languages: languages are always in contact with each other and take features from one another. This means that some varieties survive and that some do not. 

If you exchange the oak tree for the banyan tree, the model makes a lot more sense and is more correct. Still, it is not the best model out there. Nevertheless, it is still importante since it was one of the first models to bring the evolution of languages into account.

Thanks for reading!
See you soon!
x Evelien x



Sources:
http://www.sssscomic.com/comicpages/196.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2016/03/10/18/32120A8000000578-3486215-A_new_threat_is_facing_the_iconic_oak_tree_stock_image_Experts_h-a-118_1457633960069.jpg
http://cdn.c.photoshelter.com/img-get/I0000Uee9ebQg_hI/s/1000/banyan-tree-0001.jpg